Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 6, 1951PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action described in the amended writ as in tort. The declaration contains four counts, two in contract and two in tort. The case came on for trial before a jury, and after an opening statement by counsel for the plaintiff, the judge, on motion, directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted and the action is here upon a report of the judge to determine whether the direction of a verdict for the defendant "was correct either because of lack of jurisdiction of the Superior Court or because the provisions of General Regulations VI A approved by the department of public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Pollock v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Noyes v. ShanahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Aragona v. ParrellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Department of Public Utilities v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Hazel B. McTighe v. New England Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Cole v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API