Aragona v. Parrella
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.
This action of tort is here on the plaintiffs’ exception to the direction by the judge of a verdict for the defendant after the opening statement of counsel for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The action arises out of personal injuries sustained by the wife in a fall on the defendant’s premises on September 29, 1942. There were counts for negligence and gross negligence of the defendant in the wife’s action and for consequential damages in the husband’s. Since the rights of the husband depend on those of the wife, we shall hereinafter refer to her as the plaintiff.
After…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Fortier v. Hibernian Building Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Chamberlain v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Alberts v. Brockelman Brothers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Negron v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Wilkinson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- O'BRIEN v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Tempest v. RichardsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Tassinari v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.