Legal Opinion

Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1972No. 6 March Term 1972, Docket No. 53,298PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

I

Plaintiff Valentine, on his own behalf and for his wife, filed suit in Oakland County Circuit Court. He asked that Michigan Bell be ordered to provide adequate telephone service, damages for losses incurred as a result of inadequate service, punitive and exemplary damages in the amount of $790,000, and a finding that the Public Service Commission’s regulations concerning limitations of liability be declared null and void as against public policy. The claim, as amended, charged breach of contract, gross negligence, fraud and misrepre sentation, malicious and fraudulent failure to provide…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Cole v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Wade v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Wilkinson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sherman v. Sea Ray Boats, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Plainfield v. Public Service Electric and Gas CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API