Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. SMG Holdings, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 12/31/19 Certified for Publication 1/28/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE C082841 COMPANY, (Super. Ct. No. Plaintiff and Appellant, 34201600192456CUPTGDS) v. SMG HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. This case concerns whether a binding arbitration clause in an insurance policy issued by plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co., applies to a third party, defendant SMG Holdings, Inc. The trial court ruled it does not. We conclude it does. The policy had been issued to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- McGill v. Citibank, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Kevin Comer v. Micor, Inc. Kenneth C. Smith Elliot H. Wagner Barbara Arbucci, and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.