Legal Opinion
McGill v. Citibank, N.A.
California Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 2017No. S224086PublishedCited by 209 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.
*951 In previous decisions, this court has said that the statutory remedies available for a violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA; Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq. ), the unfair competition law (UCL; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq. ), and the false advertising law ( id ., § 17500 et seq.) include public injunctive relief, i.e., injunctive relief that has the primary purpose and effect of prohibiting unlawful acts that threaten future injury to the general public. ( Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems , Inc. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 303 , 315-316, 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 58 , 66 P.3d 1157 ( Cruz );…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Paula Blair v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Adir International, LLC v. Starr Indemnity & Liability CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.