Legal Opinion

Kevin Comer v. Micor, Inc. Kenneth C. Smith Elliot H. Wagner Barbara Arbucci, and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 2006No. 03-16560PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.

We consider whether an ERISA-plan participant can be compelled to arbitrate an ERISA claim brought on behalf of the plan where the plan — but not the participant — has signed an arbitration agreement.

Facts

Kevin Comer was a participant in two ERISA plans operated by Micor, Inc. The plan trustees retained Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (Smith Barney) to provide investment advice. The relationship between Smith Barney and the trustees is governed by investment management agreements. The agreements contain arbitration clauses, pursuant to which “all claims or controversies”…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Johnson v. CouturierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Jessica Kramer v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API