Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Powers

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

The question to be decided upon this appeal is whether replevin may be had by a chattel mortgagee for the possession of the personal property mortgaged when the instrument contains a provision giving him the right of possession upon default. The complaint alleges that Laura M. Powers gave the Grody Chevrolet Company a chattel mortgage on a Cadillac automobile to secure a debt of $312.24 which was to be paid in twelve monthly payments of $26.06 each. It contained the following provision: “3. In the event of default in payment of any instalment or sum payable hereunder . . . the full amount…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bickart v. SanditzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Puritan Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Lake Garda Co., Inc. v. LewittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Safford v. McNeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Valley FarmsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Morris v. Timenterial, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. In the Matter of New Idea Yankee Togs, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Atc Partnership v. Town of Windham, No. Cv 950049838s (Sep. 19, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  5. Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Haynie, No. 103638 (Nov. 24, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API