Legal Opinion
Bickart v. Sanditz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWolfe, J.
Plaintiff seeks corrections of the finding in both striking out several of the paragraphs of the finding made by the court and substituting others in her draft-finding, and also by adding thereto certain other paragraphs. An examination of the evidence discloses that no fact is found without evidence, and no material fact established by uncontradicted evidence has been omitted. The finding is therefore not to be corrected as requested.
It appears that the motortrucks described in the chattel mortgage were never placed in the possession, of plaintiff, but were retained in the possession of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Patten v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- H. G. Craig & Co. v. Uncas Paperboard Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Farrel Foundry v. DartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Puritan Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Kulis v. MollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Dennen v. SearleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Staples v. PaltenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.