Legal Opinion

Safford v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 30, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

It is admitted that the mortgage to the First National Bank was not executed “as mortgages of land in accordance with the laws of this State,” as required by §§ 5206 and 5208 of the General Statutes, which prescribe the terms on which valid mortgages of chattels retained in the possession of the mortgagor may be made. Nevertheless, the defendant claims that the record of this mortgage, covering both real and personal estate, was notice to the world of the fact of an equitable lien on the personalty attached, because § 5095 of the General Statutes provides that any instrument “intended as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Puritan Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Wheeler v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  3. Birdsall v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. Perry v. PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  5. Republic Rubber Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stankiewicz v. Miami Beach Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Bickart v. SanditzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Peckheiser v. TaroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Hartford Production Credit Asso. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Thompson Gardens West Condominium Ass'n v. MastoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API