Legal Opinion
State v. Brummett
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1917No. 14012PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered May 20, 1916, upon a trial and conviction of removing and concealing property held under a conditional sales contract.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.
The defendant, H. G. Brummett, and one L. C. Tanggard were'.jointly charged with removing and secreting personal property held under a conditional bill of sale. The charging part of the information is as follows:
“That the said H. G. Brummett and L. C. Tanggard, in the county of Pierce, in the state of Washington, on or about the 2d day of December, nineteen hundred and fifteen then and there being unlawfully, and being in possession of a certain Ford Motor Car under a conditional sales contract or lease, dated July 24th, 1915, and entered into between Automobile Finance Company, vendor, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. FetterlyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. PettitWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. MeyerkampWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Redford v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. MurieWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Weber Showcase & Fixture Co. v. WaughDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.