Legal Opinion
State v. Meyerkamp
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1914No. 12270PublishedCited by 33 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered January 29, 1914, upon a trial and conviction of rape.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The defendant in this case was charged with the crime of rape. The information, aside from the formal parts, is as follows:
“He, said G. W. Meyerkamp, in the county of King, State of Washington, on the 18th day of September, 1918, did then and there forcibly, wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously perpetrate an act of sexual intercourse with one Mary Walls, then and there a female person over the age of ten years, not the wife of said G. W. Meyerkamp, against her will and without her consent, the resistance of the said Mary Walls to said act of sexual intercourse being then and there by the said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Cranford v. O'SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. SevernsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. ClaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. StammCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- State v. LeuchWashington Supreme Court · 1939
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.