Legal Opinion
State v. Hennessy
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1921No. 15925PublishedCited by 63 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Back, J., entered January 23,1920, upon a trial and conviction of criminal syndicalism.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— The defendant was charged by an amended information with what is generally called criminal syndicalism, though it is not so named in the statute defining the crime. A demurrer to the information was overruled, the trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, and the defendant appeals.
The charging part of the information is as follows:
“That he, the said Mike Hennessy, ‘on or about the 15th day of November, 1919, in the county of Clarke and state of Washington, then and there being, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously organize, help to organize, give aid to, and voluntarily…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Brown v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Fox v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.