Legal Opinion

State v. Pettit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1913No. 11029PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered May 4, 1912, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— The defendant, together with Florence Pet-tit, his wife, were charged by information with the crime of grand larceny. The information, so far as material at present, was as follows:

“On or about the 2d day of January, 1912, in the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, the said defendant, C. M. Pettit, and the said defendant, Florence Pettit, then and there being, did unlawfully, and with intent to deprive and defraud the owner thereof, obtain from one Hattie Martin the sum of twenty-nine hundred dollars ($2,900), in lawful money of the United States of America, of the value of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. People v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. State v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. George v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. StentzWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. KosankeWashington Supreme Court · 1945

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API