Legal Opinion

Thrash v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 26, 1990No. 455A89PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

This consolidated civil action was brought pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160A-50 for judicial review of Ordinance No. 1649, passed by the City of Asheville to annex territory west of the city into its corporate limits. Upon review in a nonjury trial the ordinance was upheld, and the order of the trial court was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Although two issues were raised by the dissent in the Court of Appeals, one is dispositive and obviates discussion of the other: because an 18.25-acre tract was erroneously included in the calculation of developed property under N.C.G.S. §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Dale Ex Rel. Dale v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Rowe v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Asheville Industries, Inc. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Matheson v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Arquilla v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Briggs v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API