Legal Opinion

Arquilla v. City of Salisbury

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1999No. COA98-1398PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

On 18 February 1997, the City Council of Salisbury adopted two ordinances to annex involuntarily two areas into the corporate limits of the City of Salisbury. Property owners in the areas annexed (“petitioners”) challenge the validity of both annexation ordinances. Annexation Area 1 (“Area 1”) is generally southwest of the City while Annexation Area 2 (“Area 2”) is generally northwest of the City.

The parties dispute whether four tracts of land located within Area 1 were used for governmental purposes and thus subject to involuntary annexation by the City of Salisbury…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Dale Ex Rel. Dale v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. HookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Town of Oak IslandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Briggs v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Hayes v. Town of FairmontCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Ridgefield Properties, L.L.C. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Fix v. City of EdenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API