Legal Opinion
State v. Ledenko
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 17, 1997No. 15620-6-IIIPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The State of Washington appeals the dismissal of its second-degree rape charge against Tony Ledenko, contending Mr. Ledenko failed to appear on the scheduled day for the trial, and he waived his right to a speedy trial by failing to timely object to the violation. We affirm the dismissal.
The State charged Mr. Ledenko on October 24, 1995. He was arraigned on November 7, 1995, and trial was scheduled for January 22, 1996. The court’s scheduling order noted the speedy trial period ended on February 1, 1996.
In early January 1996, the deputy prosecutor assigned to the case made plans to attend a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. KindsvogelWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KindsvogelWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FrankenfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.