State v. Frankenfield
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
The speedy trial rule requires the defendant to make a timely objection to the trial date and alert the trial court to the particular error alleged. An objection which generally references the speedy trial rule does not notify the court of what the error is or how to remedy that error. Here, although the defendant stated a general objec*474tion to the date of arraignment, his objection did not properly alert the court to the basis for his objection. The defendant waived his right to a trial within the speedy trial period, and the trial court erred in dismissing the case.
On October 8, 1998 Johnny…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- State v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- State v. LedenkoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- City of Kennewick v. VandergriffWashington Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Chavez-RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. OsmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. OsmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.