Legal Opinion

Perno v. Exchange Mutual Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames H. Boomer, J.

The wife, a passenger in an automobile driven by her husband, was injured when his automobile collided with another. She sued the driver of the other automobile and he served upon the husband a third-party summons and complaint based upon the decision in Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y *3472d 143). Must the husband’s automobile liability insurance carrier defend and indemnify the husband against liability in the third-party action? The answer in Smith v. Employers Fire Ins. Co. (72 Misc 2d 524) was “ No. ”. In this motion for summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action the plaintiff husband…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Morgan v. . HedstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Standard Accident Insurance v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. Feinman v. Bernard Rice Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Abrams v. LaGuardiaNew York Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Logan v. Exchange Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Raia v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stone v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API