Legal Opinion

Raia v. Cook

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohn W. Sweeny, J.

This is a motion by the third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint on the ground that it is barred by subdivision 3 of section 167 of the Insurance Law.

The third-party action seeks a judgment declaring that the plaintiff husband (driver of the vehicle in collision with defendant’s vehicle) is entitled to full protection under his automobile liability policy from the third-party defendant insurance carrier against the counterclaim of the defendants who seek apportionment under the authority of Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143) for any liability found…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Smith v. Employer's Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DeLoshNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Perno v. Exchange Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Sullivan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API