Legal Opinion

Logan v. Exchange Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, *887with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint denied, and judgment granted to plaintiff insured in accordance with the following memorandum: Since Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143) the courts are required to take a new look at the traditional holding that under subdivision 3 of section 167 of the Insurance Law, originally enacted in 1937, an insurance company may not be required to defend or pay a claim in negligence by a person against her spouse unless the insurance policy has a special indorsement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Employer's Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DeLoshNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FranklinNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Perno v. Exchange Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. BarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API