Legal Opinion

Standard-Vacuum Transp. Co. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1935No. Nos. 451, 452PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the court below that the collision between the barge and ferryboat was due (a) to the failure of the ferryboat to keep clear and (2) to the absence of a light on the bow of the barge. The steamtug was also properly held for failure to provide for a light on the barge. The Sif, 266 F. 166 (C. C. A. 2). Since the libel was filed in rem against both barge and tug, the fault is viewed as that of the vessels themselves, as separate offenders. The Eugene F. Moran v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., 212 U. S. 466, 29 S. Ct. 339, 53 L. Ed. 600. As the three vessels were at fault, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Eugene F. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Louis-Dreyfus v. Seaboard Great Lakes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. The SifCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Seafoods Corp. v. J. S. Packard Dredging Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. Moran Towing & Transp. Co., Inc. v. Empresa Hondurena De VaporesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. The Norwich VictoryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. In re Socony Vacuum Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Isthmian Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API