Legal Opinion

Louis-Dreyfus v. Seaboard Great Lakes Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 13, 1934No. 266PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The libellant made a contract with the respondent, the Seaboard Great Lakes Corporation, to carry a cargo of grain from Buffalo to New York. The carrier employed its own barge which it put into a tow in charge of two tugs chartered from ,the claimant, Atlantic Lighterage Corporation,, but manned, vict-ualled and operated by itself. While passing between two piers of a bridge of the New York Central Railroad Company over the Hudson river at Albany, the tugs let the barge strike the false-work at the end of one of the piers; she was holed forward and sank after being…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. The Eugene F. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Erie Railroad v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. The Ira M. HedgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. The BeatriceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. The Norwich VictoryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Standard-Vacuum Transp. Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Boston Metals Co. v. The Winding Gulf the St. FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  5. Willis v. Tugs Tramp & MarsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API