Tomco2 Equipment Co. v. Southeastern Agri-Systems, Inc.

ORDER and OPINION

JULIE E. CARNES, District Judge.

This case is presently before the. Court on plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend (“PL’s Mot. to Am.”) [27] and defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings (“Def.’s Mot. to Stay”) [69]. The Court has reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and, for the reasons set out below, concludes that both plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend [27] and defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings [69] should be GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

During the period relevant to this litigation, Tomco2 (“plaintiff”) and Southeastern Agri-Systems, Inc. (“Southeastern” or…