Sanders v. Cline
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory; J. T. Dicleerson, Judge. Action by B. F. Cline against J. W. Sanders and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, whence the cansé was transferred to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory; J. T. Dicleerson, Judge. Action by B. F. Cline against J. W. Sanders and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, whence the cansé was transferred to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. On the 19th day of October, 1904, B. F. Cline filed his complaint in the United States Court for the Southern "District o£ Indian Territory at Ryan, in which he represented that he was a citizen of the United States, and not a member of…
1Opinion of the CourtDuNN, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The verdict of .the jury determined the controverted questions of fact which are reasonably sustained by the evidence in favor of plaintiff, Cline, and the questions raised before us on this appeal are: First, did the petition state a cause of action; and, if so, did error occur in the acceptance or rejection of the evidence or the presentation of the issues by the court to the jury in its instructions? These questions are all raised by the assignments of error by appellant, and we will consider them in the order stated.
It will be observed that the sole…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- State ex rel. Russell v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- Kuhl v. Supreme Lodge Select Knights & LadiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Razzo v. VarniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- City of Oklahoma City v. Hill Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Oden v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Crow v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Bartlesville Interurban Ry. Co. v. QuaidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.