Legal Opinion
Oden v. Russell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 18, 1952No. 35214PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The parties will be given their trial court designation. Plaintiffs in error were defendants.
In this cause plaintiffs filed an amended petition alleging ownership of the south two acres of lot 6 in McMul-lin’s addition to Oklahoma City and that defendants had ousted plaintiffs of possession, without right, of the north 93 feet of said real estate; that defendants had torn down and removed a boundary line fence constructed by plaintiffs, to their damage; that defendants had turned their livestock into a boysenberry patch and had later plowed up and destroyed the same, and by unlawfully keeping…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Crow v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Brown v. HigbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Cook v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Thiry v. Armstrong World IndustriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.