Legal Opinion
Hall v. United Rentals, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 23, 2006No. 4166PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, the Appellate Panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission found Hall (the claimant) had not reached maximum medical improvement and ordered United/Cambridge (employer/carrier) to pay for additional medical treatment that United/Cambridge did not authorize. The circuit court affirmed and United/Cambridge appealed, contending (1) the Appellate Panel’s requiring payment for unauthorized medical treatment violated section 42-15-60 of the South Carolina Code, and (2) the Appellate Panel’s finding Hall had not reached MMI was not supported by “reliable,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hall v. Desert Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Houston v. Deloach & DeloachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Mungo v. Rental Uniform Service of Florence, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Thompson Ex Rel. Harvey v. CISSON CONST.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.