Legal Opinion

Peer Bearing Company - Changsh v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 12, 2014No. 2014-1001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The Timken Company (Timken) appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade affirming the United States Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) calculation of an antidumping duty margin for Peer Bearing Company— Changshan’s (CPZ) imports. For the reasons below, we vacate and remand.

BACKGROUND

This case involves Commerce’s administrative review of CPZ’s entry of tapered roller bearings that were subject to an Antidumping Duty Order. CPZ imported the bearings by selling them to an unaffiliated U.S. importer. The U.S. importer then sold the bearings to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Peer Bearing Company-Changshan v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  3. Peer Bearing Co.-Changshan v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  2. Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Diamond Sawblades v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  4. Vicentin S.A.I.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  5. Calgon Carbon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API