Hiatt v. City of Greensboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOoNNOR, J.
On its appeal to this Court, tbe defendant, city of Greensboro, contends that upon all tbe evidence introduced at tbe trial in tbe Superior Court, plaintiffs are not entitled to recover of tbe defendant tbe damages, if any, resulting to tbeir property situate on tbe east side of South Spring Street, from tbe closing by defendant of said street at its intersection with tbe tracks of tbe North Carolina Eailroad Company and its lessee, tbe Southern Eailway Company, and that it was, therefore, error for tbe trial court (1) to refuse to allow its motion made at tbe close of all tbe evidence, for-…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Colvin v. Tallassee Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Crowell v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Glenn v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.