Colvin v. Tallassee Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.
At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence and at the close of all the evidence defendant made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled the motions, and in this we can see no error.
The questions involved: First, Was the obstruction and flooding by the defendant of the roads which gave plaintiffs ingress and egress to their land wrongful? We think so.
It is admitted by defendant that prior to 1910, and up to 5 December, 1927, there was a public road, known as the Santeetlah Eoad, which led into the old State Turnpike Eoad at Stump Ford, which traversed Graham…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Neal v. . Wake CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Draper v. Conner & Walters Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- City of Durham v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Snow v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Hiatt v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Sanders v. . SmithfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Davis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.