Legal Opinion
Croslin v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Tax Court
Decided June 16, 2005No. TC 4727PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the Petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus filed by Relator Department of Revenue (the department). The parties adverse to that writ, Oscar A. Croslin and Gloria J. Bas (taxpayers), have not appeared in this matter.
In the submissions it has filed, the department describes the posture of this matter as follows. In the Magistrate Division, the department prevailed against the substantive claims asserted by taxpayers. The magistrate assigned to that case determined that taxpayers’ claims were frivolous. As a result, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Hupp Motor Car Corp. v. KanzlerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- State Ex Rel. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
- Dept. of Rev. v. CroslinOregon Tax Court · 2006