Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1994No. SC S40959PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

Plaintiff-relator (Anderson) seeks a writ of mandamus ordering defendant, a circuit court judge, to vacate a protective order issued in an underlying civil action, in which Anderson is the plaintiff. Pursuant to ORCP 39 C(l), Anderson gave notice of his intention to take the deposition of the defendant (White) in the underlying action. The notice stated that Anderson intended to record that deposition, and all other depositions, by videotape pursuant to ORCP 39 C(4). White moved, pursuant to ORCP 36 C, for a protective order requiring that the deposition be recorded stenographically only and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Keisling v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Hupp Motor Car Corp. v. KanzlerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Nielson v. BrysonOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jerry B. v. Sally B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. A.J.C. ex rel. T.D.B. v. L.S.B.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Miller v. Pacific Trawlers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Longo v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Tracy v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API