Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Kirschberg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1897No. 2568PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam County. — Hon. J. C. McOlintoh, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This appeal is from a decree of the superior court of Clallam county. Respondent has moved to strike from the record what purports to be exceptions to certain findings of fact and conclusions of law and to dismiss the appeal on various grounds, only one of which will be noticed. The decree was entered on October 24, 1896. Ho exceptions to the findings or conclusions were filed until January 4, 1897. Sec. 3 of the act of March 8, 1893 (Session Laws, p. 112), provides that exceptions to- the findings of fact or conclusions of law may be taken…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McQuesten v. MorrillWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Irwin v. Olympia Water WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Braely v. MarksWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meeker v. WaddleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kitsap County Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Woodhurst v. CramerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Cornthwaite v. Barrington Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API