Woodhurst v. Cramer
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. George W. Belt, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered hy
Hadley, J.
This action was brought hy appellant against respondents toi obtain possession of certain real estate in Spokane county, which it is alleged is wrongfully withheld from appellant by respondents. A trial was had before the court without a jury, and a judgment entered to the effect that appellant is not entitled to- the possession of any of the lands- as against respondents William H. Cramer and Rachel Cramer. Other features of the judgment will he hereinafter mentioned. From the judgment the plaintiff in the action has appealed.
Respondents…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rice v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Webb v. MeloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Hannegan v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Rumpp v. GerkensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Polk v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pacific State Bank v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Nichols v. CapenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Shapard v. MixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.