McQuesten v. Morrill
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
Preceding the argument upon the merits, a motion was made to strike the statement of facts on the ground that the law had nqt been complied with as to the time of its filing. The decree was renderéd on the 31st of May, 1894. Appellant served notice on *336respondent that he would apply on June 27th for an extension of time within which to file and- serve the statement of facts, hut the matter was not heard at this time, on account of the absence of the judge before whom the case was tried. Thereafter, on July 30th, upon the application of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Acker v. . AckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Smith v. PackardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Garneau v. Port Blakely Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- McCrea v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Forcht v. ShortSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Earle v. Froedtert Grain & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
- State ex rel. Bickford v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Dodds v. GregsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Wollin v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Michaelson v. OvermeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.