In Re Barlow v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, J., pro tem.
The facts herein are in dispute. It appears that certain lands were granted to one Charles Henry Barlow, from which were reserved to the grantor and excepted from the grant all minerals and rights in relation thereto, including “all oil, petroleum, asphaltum and like substances, and the right to mine, dig or bore for the same, and also all convenient rights of way and of storage over and within the surface of said lands.” Such property rights as were thus reserved by the grantor were subsequently conveyed to the Security Trust & Savings Bank.
Under the provisions of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hicks v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Moore v. SmawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Doran v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Fremont v. SealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Stoakes v. Barrett & Co.California Supreme Court · 1855
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Schiffman v. Richfield Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Cross v. Board of Land CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Hagge v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Williams v. WattWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.