Legal Opinion

Doran v. Central Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 8 opinions

.Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.

This is an action to recover damages for a trespass upon a tract of land claimed by the plaintiff) and for an injunction to restrain the defendant from injuring the said land, and a quartz lode, mining claim, and growing trees thereon. The defendant justifies under the right of way granted to said railroad company by the Act of Congress, passed July 1; 1862. (12 United States Statutes at Large, p. 489.)

It appears from the statement of facts, as agreed to by the parties, that the plaintiffs are in possession of the tract of land described in the complaint, and have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Milwaukee & Horicon RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hicks v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Cal. N. R.R. v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. Imperial Water Co. No. 8California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Brandt v. WheatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hamilton v. Spokane & Palouse RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In Re Barlow v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Placer County Water Agency v. JonasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API