Legal Opinion

Citizens' Life-Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1901PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Mandamus by the Citizens’ Life-Insurance Company to compel James V. Barry, commissioner of insurance, to issue a certificate renewing relator’s authority to do business.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The relator is a domestic co-operative or mutual benefit association, to which the respondent, the State commissioner, has refused to issue a certificate, which in this proceeding it asks a mandamus to compel. The relator was organized in October, 1899, under Act No. 187 of the Public Acts of 1887. Tho reason given for such refusal is that, upon investigation required by law, respondent has found that relator is not doing business in. *87conformity to law, and therefore he is not at liberty to issue such certificate. A more detailed statement is found in respondent’s answer. It states that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WetherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Bolton v. BoltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882
  3. Miner v. Michigan Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State Life Insurance v. StrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People's Mutual Benefit Society v. LesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gray v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Heffron v. DalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Urwan v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Johnson v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API