Legal Opinion

Heffron v. Daly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1903No. Docket No. 10PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by John Heffron against William M. Daly upon a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

This plaintiff’s action is based upon a promissory note for $139, dated September 8, 1896, payable to the plaintiff, or order, on dr before January 1, 1897. His proof shows that the note was given in payment of the first premium upon a policy of insurance, which policy was afterwards delivered to the defendant by the plaintiff, who was agent for the company issuing it, to which company the amount of the note was paid by the plaintiff as its share of the premium.

*614By way of defense, the defendant insists that he received no consideration for the note, which he said was given “ for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Richardson v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Citizens' Life-Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State Life Insurance v. StrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. O'Brien v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Union Trust Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gray v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Urwan v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API