Legal Opinion

State Life Insurance v. Strong

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by the State Life Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Indiana, against Nathaniel E. Strong, on certain promissory notes. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff is a foreign insurance company. It brought this action upon two premium notes given by one of its policy holders in Michigan. The evidence disclosed that one of the plaintiff’s agents approached the defendant, and sought to induce him to take a policy from the plaintiff, on October 1, 1898, and that defendant upon that day made application for a $5,000 policy, and for appointment as the advisory representative of the company. On October 4th the company issued its policy, and on or about October 9th it issued its advisory representative contract, so called. The applications were…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gray v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Heffron v. DalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Urwan v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Citizens' Life-Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API