Legal Opinion

People's Mutual Benefit Society v. Lester

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Case made from Branch. (Yaple, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff is a foreign mutual benefit society. By arrangement between its officers and the defendant, the latter collected, within the State of Michigan, from its members living in said State, money assessed by the plaintiff upon its members, for which it recovered judgment in the circuit court. The findings of fact show that at the time of the transactions out of which this litigation grows the plaintiff had not complied with the laws of this State, and was not authorized to do business herein, but, on the contrary, was forbidden, under a penalty. How. Stat. § 4225.1

It is contended by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seamans v. Temple Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Willson v. OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Rough v. BreitungMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Memphis & Arkansas River Packet Co. v. AgnewTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Citizens' Life-Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hastings Industrial Co. v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API