Legal Opinion

People v. Glab

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1936No. Crim. 2846PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

Defendants were jointly charged by grand jury indictment with the crimes of forgery (Pen. Code, see. 470) and preparing false evidence (Pen. Code, see. 134). Defendant Fred Steeger pleaded guilty. Upon a jury trial his eodefendant Glab was found guilty on both counts, and Clara Steeger, acquitted of the forgery charge, was found guilty of preparing false evidence. This appeal is prosecuted by both defendants Glab and Clara Steeger from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying their motion for new trial.

According to the evidence produced at the trial, defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GregorsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In Re Application of O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Harrington v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re HorowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. MabryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. LittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Pretlow v. PretlowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API