Legal Opinion

People v. Hartman

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1900No. Crim. No. 663PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order refusing a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendant has been convicted of the crime of bigamy and appeals to this court.

It is first insisted that the challenge to the panel of jurors should have been allowed. The challenge was based upon the claim that the sheriff who summoned the jurors was biased. This officer was placed upon the stand and examined at length as to his state of mind, and w'e will not here detail his evidence. It may be conceded that it is not entirely explicit, and possibly is contradictory to some extent, yet he testifies that he had “no opinion as to whether or not the defendant was the husband of Mrs. Hartman,”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Case v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. People v. BeeversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. NorthcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. GlabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API