Legal Opinion

People v. Morton

California Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1903No. Crim. No. 928PublishedCited by 49 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

The appellant and one Robert Stokes were jointly indicted for the crime of robbery from the person of one William Hickling. Separate trials were demanded, and appellant, Morton, was put upon trial, was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment in the state’s prison for the term of ten years, and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

During the trial, and before the prosecution rested, upon motion of the district attorney, the prosecution was dismissed as to defendant Stokes, who was thereupon called and sworn as a witness for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Childers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  3. People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API