Legal Opinion

S.H. v. Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 28, 1988No. 87-8635PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the district court and the rulings questioned on appeal are affirmed based upon and for the reasons stated in the thoughtful Order of Court entered on April 10, 1987 and appended hereto.

The dissent criticizes our approach in this matter and consequently, we add these thoughts. The plaintiffs won the lawsuit. Extensive relief was afforded. Both the United States Magistrate and the District Judge entered substantial writings explaining the various rulings. In our opinion, nothing is gained by repeating that analysis. Where we part company is on the one issue of whether the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Robert W. Phillips v. James ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Detention of JsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. L.C. Ex Rel. Zimring v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Croft v. HarderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
  4. Wyatt, by and Through Rawlins v. KingDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
  5. In Re Application of Noel for Discharge HearingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API