Legal Opinion
Croft v. Harder
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 9, 1989No. Civ. A. 86-1692-TPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint alleges claims under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, and under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 9501. Specifically, plaintiff's complaint alleges that he was deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law and was denied equal protection of the law. Plaintiff seeks an award of actual and punitive damages.
The defendants named in the first amended complaint are:…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kevin Monahan v. Dorchester Counseling Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Briand v. LavigneDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Reiger v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Fugate v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas CityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.