Legal Opinion

Matter of Howell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1981No. 81-12, CA A20151PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an appeal from an order declaring petitioner to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the custody of the Oregon Mental Health Division. Petitioner assigns as errors the finding by the trial court that he is a mentally ill person as defined in ORS 426.005(2) 1 and the finding that he was not willing and able to participate in treatment on a voluntary basis as described in ORS 426.130(1). 2 In our de novo review, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we conclude the evidence is insufficient to establish that petitioner is a mentally ill person.

The notice of mental…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Matter of LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Pantano v. ObbisoOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Matter of AllmendingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Matter of JepsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. WoolridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. D. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API