Matter of Jepson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.
Petitioner appeals his involuntary commitment ordered pursuant to ORS 426.130(3). The sole question on appeal is whether there was clear and convincing evidence 2 to support the court’s decision that he was a mentally ill person as defined in ORS 426.005(2). We review de novo 3 and reverse.
ORS 426.005 provides:
"As used in ORS 426.005 to 426.390, unless the context requires otherwise:
"(2) 'Mentally ill person’ means a person who, because of a mental disorder, is either:
"(a) Dangerous to himself or others; or "(b) Unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Matter of LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Matter of AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Matter of NesbittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Matter of AllmendingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. HittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. PuhaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Matter of FletcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.