Holsum Bakery v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge.
This is a special action review of the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) rejecting a proposed settlement of supportive medical care benefits. The ALJ rejected the settlement agreement solely because it reserved a credit in favor of the carrier against any future supportive medical care benefits paid to the claimant. The principal issue is whether the Industrial Commission’s policy statement disapproving settlements affecting future medical benefits accurately reflects the public policy of the Workers’ Compensa*256tion Act. We conclude it does not. Consequently, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Evertsen v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Gray v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Brewster v. Cooley & AssociatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Time, D.C. Freight Lines v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Blevins v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Blevins v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011