Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 May an oral compromise and settlement agreement be approved by the Industrial Commission of Arizona (ICA) and enforced against the employer and carrier, even though the claimant died before a written compromise and settlement agreement (“G & S”) was executed? We answer this question in the affirmative and set aside a decision upon review declining to approve a C & S.
Facts and Procedural History
¶ 2 On July 31, 2000, the attorneys for the parties orally agreed to settle Howard Tabler’s workers’ compensation claim as noncompensable for $55,000. Tabler’s attorney, Robert…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Rogus v. LordsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Frost Construction Co. v. Lobo, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Alexander v. O'NEILArizona Supreme Court · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Williams v. Alhambra School District No. 68District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Althaus v. CornelioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Gaughan v. Cavan (In Re Strasser)District Court, D. Arizona · 2004
- Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.