Legal Opinion

Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 18, 2002No. 1CA-IC 01-0012PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 May an oral compromise and settlement agreement be approved by the Industrial Commission of Arizona (ICA) and enforced against the employer and carrier, even though the claimant died before a written compromise and settlement agreement (“G & S”) was executed? We answer this question in the affirmative and set aside a decision upon review declining to approve a C & S.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 On July 31, 2000, the attorneys for the parties orally agreed to settle Howard Tabler’s workers’ compensation claim as noncompensable for $55,000. Tabler’s attorney, Robert…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Rogus v. LordsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Frost Construction Co. v. Lobo, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Alexander v. O'NEILArizona Supreme Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Williams v. Alhambra School District No. 68District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  2. Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Althaus v. CornelioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Gaughan v. Cavan (In Re Strasser)District Court, D. Arizona · 2004
  5. Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Arizona Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API