Legal Opinion

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1986No. CV 86 0091-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether workers’ compensation claims may be settled after compensability has been established but before lost earning capacity has been determined. The court of appeals held that because A.R.S. § 23-1025 1 prohibits settlement once compensability has been established, the Industrial Commission (Commission) lacks jurisdiction to accept or review post-compensability settlements. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 152 Ariz. 37, 730 P.2d 214 (Ct.App.1985). We accepted review to clarify A.R.S. § 23-1025 and its effect on the Commission’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Brigham Young University v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Prigosin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gray v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tabler v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Hester v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Dutton v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Pacific Western Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API